🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 859+ reviews
Vintage ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Vintage Cinelli cycling cap

★★★★★ 4.4 out of 5 (859 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$125
$208.33
Sale
✓ gratis distribution on this item • Limited time offer

incredibly rare from a private collection. NOS you won’t find another. From Italy

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy distribution
↩️
hassle-at no charge Returns

📋 Product Description

Vintage Cinelli cycling cap

incredibly rare from a private collection. NOS you won’t find another. From Italy​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 119356

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Hats

Original Price: $208.33 USD

Sale Price: $125 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 shipment & Returns

✓ at no charge dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.4
★★★★★
Based on 7004 reviews
AP​
Adam Parker ✓ Verified Purchase
8 months ago · Dallas, TX
★★★★★
Absolutely flawless
For the price, the Vintage Cinelli cycling cap feels okay and I don’t regret it. Works fine so far.​
21 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright ✓ Verified Purchase
3 months ago · Denver, CO
★★★★★
remarkable find!
truly happy with this Vintage Cinelli cycling cap. Shipping was prompt.
33 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · San Diego, CA
★★★★★
Absolutely cherish it
From my experience, it is hassle-on the house to use and it works for me.
36 people found this helpful​
DC
Daniel Clark ✓ Verified Purchase
10 months ago · Denver, CO
★★★★☆
outstanding Vintage Cinelli cycling cap
The Vintage Cinelli cycling cap is plain and convenient to use.
47 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell ✓ Verified Purchase
10 months ago · Raleigh, NC
★★★★★
So happy with this
After a few days, the Vintage Cinelli cycling cap performs as expected which is good enough. Works fine so far.
45 people found this helpful