๐Ÿšš no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 515+ reviews
Men โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Womens Cat Eye Sunglasses High Fashion Sexy Vintage Shades Black

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.2 out of 5 (515 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12.99​
$21.65
Sale
โœ“ gratis distribution on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Non-Polarized

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
speedy delivery

โ†ฉ๏ธ
hassle-no-cost Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Womens Cat Eye Sunglasses High Fashion Sexy Vintage Shades Black

  • Non-Polarized

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 420751

Category: Men > ACCESSORIES > Sunglasses

Original Price: $21.65 USD

Sale Price: $12.99 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 6575 reviews
JM​
Jessica Moore โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Memphis, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding!
Good value purchase Womens Cat Eye Sunglasses High Fashion Sexy Vintage Shades Black.
15 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Chicago, IL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Absolutely treasure it
The Womens Cat Eye Sunglasses High Fashion Sexy Vintage Shades Black feels solid so far.
8 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Cincinnati, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Exactly what I needed
To be fair, it works well enough and it works for me.
17 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Pittsburgh, PA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fancy it!
Solid Womens Cat Eye Sunglasses High Fashion Sexy Vintage Shades Black. Feels reliable.
29 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Aurora, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
simply what I wanted
At first, it does the job so Iโ€™m okay with it.
8 people found this helpful