🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 305+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Ice Cream Bowls

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (305 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$22
$36.67
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Set of (3) vintage Ice Cream Bowls. Made exclusively for The J.M. Smucker Company.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
hassle-no-cost Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Ice Cream Bowls

Set of (3) vintage Ice Cream Bowls. Made exclusively for The J.M. Smucker Company.​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 752672

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Bowls

Original Price: $36.67 USD

Sale Price: $22 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9827 reviews
AD
Amanda Davis
3 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
truly satisfied
After a few use, the Vintage Ice Cream Bowls does its job which is good enough.
27 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson
6 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific investment
For the price, the Vintage Ice Cream Bowls is practical and it’s fine overall. Nothing fancy.
26 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
Personally, it works as described which is good enough.
15 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Totally worth it
No issues so far with the Vintage Ice Cream Bowls.
17 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fancy this Vintage Ice Cream Bowls!
At first, the Vintage Ice Cream Bowls works well enough which is good enough.
11 people found this helpful